Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2016 / Jun / Ring in the Changes
Glaucoma Health Economics and Policy Business and Entrepreneurship

Ring in the Changes

Is a bimatoprost-eluting silicone ring a credible alternative to eyedrops?

By Mark Hillen 6/9/2016 1 min read

Share

Figure 1. Bimatoprost-eluting 1 mm-diameter silicone ring that is fitted over a patient’s upper and lower fornices and delivers therapeutic doses for a 6-month period. Image courtesy of ForSight VISION5

In patients with glaucoma, every missed dose of topical antiglaucoma therapy means poorer IOL control and faster vision loss. Regimen adherence varies from patient to patient, and missing a dose now and then isn’t the end of the world. But IOP control often requires multiple drops, and the effect of missing doses can quickly add up. Naturally, anything that can support medication compliance will help patients preserve their vision for longer. One approach that’s currently being investigated is a drug-eluting ocular insert ring (ForSight VISION5), which is placed on the upper and lower fornices of patients’ eyes (Figure 1). Comprised of a 1 mm bimatoprost-silicone matrix, the ring elutes therapeutic drug doses over a 6-month period. Results of a Phase II trial comparing the bimatoprost ring plus artificial tears with a placebo ring plus twice daily timolol 0.5% eyedrops in patients (n=130) with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension controllable by monotherapy are now published (1). In this multicenter, randomized, double-masked trial, the primary efficacy measure was the difference in mean (diurnal) IOP change from baseline.

And the results? Over 6 months, reductions from baseline IOP ranged from  3.2 to -6.4 mmHg and -4.2 to -6.4 mmHg in the bimatoprost and timolol groups, respectively. The ring was well tolerated – at the end of the trial, 88.5 and 90.9 percent of patients still had the bimatoprost and placebo ring in place, respectively, and reported ocular discomfort rates were low for the bimatoprost (6.3 percent) and placebo rings (3.0 percent). However, of the three diurnal time points on each of the three days of IOP assessment (at weeks 2, 6 and 12), the bimatoprost implant was non-inferior to timolol at only two of them.This may have been because the trial was underpowered to detect the observed treatment effect, and this will be addressed in later Phase III studies.

Nevertheless, the bimatoprost ring was assessed under highly controlled clinical trial conditions where patients were compelled to be fully compliant with all dosing regimens. In the real world, the implant is being aimed at precisely those patients who struggle to do that. The ring has a large surface area – enough to carry a combination of ocular antihypertensive agents, and the fact that it can deliver drugs to the surface of the eye for an extended period with a high retention rate opens up the possibility that it might be used for the treatment of ocular surface disease, ocular allergy or post-surgical inflammation, all of which are under development.

References

  1. JD Brandt et al., “Six-month intraocular pressure reduction with a topical bimatoprost ocular insert: results of a phase II randomized controlled study”, Ophthalmol, [E-pub ahead of print] (2016). PMID: 27157843.

About the Author(s)

Mark Hillen

I spent seven years as a medical writer, writing primary and review manuscripts, congress presentations and marketing materials for numerous – and mostly German – pharmaceutical companies. Prior to my adventures in medical communications, I was a Wellcome Trust PhD student at the University of Edinburgh.

More Articles by Mark Hillen

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: