Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Podcasts
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2024 / Aug / Landmark nAMD Treatment
Research & Innovations Retina

Landmark nAMD Treatment

Could robot-assisted radiotherapy offer a new treatment choice for neovascular age-related macular degeneration?

By Alun Evans 8/13/2024 3 min read

Share

For the majority of patients, neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) demands long-term management. Existing literature notes that the current cornerstone treatment for nAMD – intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF agents every one-to-three months – can be slightly more effective than a pro re nata (PRN) injection regimen (1).

But what if there was a way to further cut down intravitreal injection frequency for patients?

A research team at King’s College London has successfully tested a custom-built, robotically controlled device that administers three beams of highly focused overlapping radiation at the macula of patients.

In a randomized, sham-controlled trial designed to test efficacy of the device (2), the researchers enrolled 411 participants between 2015 and 2019, with 274 receiving the stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) treatment and 137 receiving the sham treatment. The study, published in The Lancet, reported a 22 percent reduction in the number of ranibizumab injections required in the SRT patients; the researchers estimate that this treatment could potentially save 1.8 million injections per year globally.

“The key attraction [of SRT] is that it doesn’t involve an intravitreal injection and can be delivered in a simple, one-off, outpatient procedure,” explains study lead Timothy Jackson, a consultant ophthalmic surgeon at King's College Hospital, London. “[And] it only needs to be delivered once, so thereafter we do not rely on patient compliance to drive efficacy.”

Even taking into account the cost of SRT treatment, in the UK (where the study was conducted) the reduced dosing of ranibizumab led to net cost-savings of around £565 per patient over a two-year period.

When it comes to the global future of the SRT device, Jackson is optimistic but cautious: “Research has previously tried to find a better way to target radiotherapy to the macula… but so far nothing has been sufficiently precise to target macular disease less than 1 mm across. With this purpose-built robotic system, we can be incredibly precise. However, the positive and negative effects of radiation can manifest over a long time horizon, so it will be important to review the year 3 and 4 data before advocating widespread adoption.”

References

  1. E Li et al., “Treatment regimens for administration of anti‐vascular endothelial growth factor agents for neovascular age‐related macular degeneration,” Cochrane Database Syst Rev., 5 (2020). PMID: 32374423.
  2. TL Jackson et al., “Stereotactic radiotherapy for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (STAR): a pivotal, randomised, double-masked, sham-controlled device trial,” The Lancet [Online ahead of print.] (2024). PMID: 38876132.

About the Author(s)

Alun Evans

More Articles by Alun Evans

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: