Conexiant
Login
  • Corneal Physician
  • Glaucoma Physician
  • New Retinal Physician
  • Ophthalmology Management
  • Ophthalmic Professional
  • Presbyopia Physician
  • Retinal Physician
The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2025 / December / OCT and Imaging in Central Nervous System Diseases
Retina Research & Innovations Discussion

OCT and Imaging in Central Nervous System Diseases

The eye as a window to the brain

By Andrzej Grzybowski, Kai Jin 12/19/2025 3 min read

Share

“The brain is the organ we see the least and need to understand the most.”
Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has changed that equation. Over the last decade, OCT has moved beyond ophthalmology into neurology, providing a unique non-invasive window into central nervous system (CNS) health. Because the retina is an extension of the brain – originating embryologically from the neural tube – patterns of neurodegeneration in the CNS are mirrored in retinal structure and microvasculature (1, 2).

Why the eye matters in brain disease

Traditional neuroimaging (MRI, PET) captures macrostructural and metabolic changes in the brain. In contrast, OCT reveals neuroaxonal damage at the cellular and microstructural level, particularly within the retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL), ganglion cell complex (GCC), and peripapillary region.

These biomarkers correlate with disease severity, progression, and cognitive decline across numerous neurological disorders (3-6).

Key principle:Retinal thinning = CNS neuronal loss – measurable, repeatable, and prognostically relevant.

OCT across neurological disorders

OCT has demonstrated value in monitoring:

Figure 1. Example of retinal layer segmentation using OCT compared to histology. (A) OCT image depicts retinal layers relative to the corresponding retinal layers on (B) histology in a representative control micrograph stained with hematoxylin and eosin within the macula.
Bridging retina and brain: oculomics

The concept of using fundus inspection to diagnose CNS disorders is not new. In 1866, Polish ophthalmologist Ksawery Gałęzowski [1832-1907] published  a whole textbook on the value of examining the optic disc to diagnose CNS disorders(7), coining the term "cerebroscopy" for using ophthalmoscopy for this purpose. In the 20th century, Vincenze Parisi pioneered the use of OCT to evaluate neurodegenerative disorders (8). The emerging field of oculomics uses retinal structure and microvasculature to infer systemic and neurological disease risk. Retinal biomarkers can serve as:
  • Predictive tools (early neurodegeneration signal)

  • Monitoring tools (disease progression & therapy response)

  • Translational research endpoints (from animal models to patient care) By integrating OCT with MRI or PET, researchers can map retinal changes to cortical and white matter networks, supporting a unified neurodegeneration model (9, 10).

Figure 2. Retinal changes in PD. Structure of the healthy retina, and retinopathy in PD patients.
Barriers to clinical integration

Despite strong biological rationale, adoption remains uneven:

  1. Standardization challenges – Variability across OCT platforms, segmentation algorithms, and reference databases.

  2. Interpretation complexity – Neurologists may lack OCT training; ophthalmologists may lack neurological context.

  3. Regulatory uncertainty – OCT as a biomarker, rather than a diagnostic test, occupies a gray zone in clinical guidelines.

  4. Data civersity issues – Most OCT datasets originate from tertiary centers in high-income regions.

Building a path toward widespread impact

To embed OCT into routine neurology workflows, we need:

  • Cross-specialty training between ophthalmology and neurology

  • Multi-center harmonized imaging standards (e.g., APOSTEL, OSCAR-IB)

  • Longitudinal biomarker validation linked to cognitive and functional outcomes

  • Accessible screening pathways for community and primary care settings

The convergence of imaging, machine learning, and telemedicine is accelerating progress. AI models trained on OCT can now detect neurodegenerative signatures earlier than clinical examination alone (11, 12).

Conclusion

The concept of the eye as a window to the brain is no longer metaphorical – it is measurable, quantifiable, and clinically actionable. As OCT technology advances and interdisciplinary collaboration deepens, the retina will play a central role in early detection, monitoring, and therapeutic stratification for CNS diseases.

OCT’s future in neurology is not only about earlier diagnosis – it is about enabling preventive care, preserving function, and improving quality of life.

OCT and Imaging in Central Nervous System Diseases: The Eye as a Window to the Brain, A Grzybowski, P Barboni (eds.), Springer Nature (2025) is available here.

References

  1. J Zhou et al., “OCT and Imaging in Central Nervous System Diseases: The Eye as a Window to the Brain,” in A Grzybowski, P Barboni (eds.), OCT and Imaging in Central Nervous System Diseases: The Eye as a Window to the Brain, 315, Springer Nature (2025).
  2. A London et al., “The retina as a window to the brain – from eye research to CNS disorders,” Nat Rev Neurol, 9, 44 (2013). PMID: 23165340.
  3. P Mailankody et al., “Optical coherence tomography as a tool to evaluate retinal changes in Parkinson’s disease,” Parkinsonism Relat Disord, 21, 1164 (2015). PMID: 26297381.
  4. JY Lee et al., “Optical coherence tomography in Parkinson’s disease: is the retina a biomarker?” J Parkinsons Dis, 4, 197 (2014). PMID: 24518436.
  5. PJ Snyder et al., “Retinal imaging in Alzheimer’s and neurodegenerative diseases,” Alzheimers Dement, 17, 103 (2021). PMID: 33090722.
  6. CS Lee, RS Apte, “Retinal biomarkers of Alzheimer disease,” Am J Ophthalmol, 218, 337 (2020). PMID: 32387435.
  7. X Gałęzowski, “Étude ophtalmoscopique sur les altérations du nerf optique et les maladies cérébrales dont elles dépendent,” Librairie de L. Leclerc, Paris (1866).
  8. V Parisi et al., “Correlation between morphological and functional retinal impairment in multiple sclerosis patients,” Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci, 40, 2520 (1999). PMID: 10509645.
  9. CY Cheung et al., “Retinal ganglion cell analysis using high-definition optical coherence tomography in patients with mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease,” J Alzheimers Dis, 45, 45 (2015). PMID: 25428254.
  10. G Coppola et al., “Optical coherence tomography in Alzheimer’s disease: a meta-analysis,” PLoS One, 10, e0134750 (2015). PMID: 26252902.
  11. S Saidha et al., “Optical coherence tomography reflects brain atrophy in multiple sclerosis: a four-year study,” Ann Neurol, 78, 801 (2015). PMID: 26190464.
  12. A Petzold et al., “Optical coherence tomography in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis,” Lancet Neurol, 9, 921 (2010). PMID: 20723847.

About the Author(s)

Andrzej Grzybowski

Andrzej Grzybowski is a professor of ophthalmology at the University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland, and the Head of Institute for Research in Ophthalmology at the Foundation for Ophthalmology Development, Poznan, Poland. He is EVER Past-President, Treasurer of the European Academy of Ophthalmology, and a member of the Academia Europea. He is co-founder and leader of the International AI in Ophthalmology Society (https://iaisoc.com/) and has written a book on the subject that can be found here: https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-78601-4.

More Articles by Andrzej Grzybowski

Kai Jin

Kai Jin MD, PhD is a clinician-scientist and research fellow at the Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine. His work focuses on ophthalmology, artificial intelligence, and precision medicine. He has led multiple national research grants and published over 100 SCI papers in journals including NPJ Digital Medicine, IEEE TMI, and JAMA Ophthalmology. He serves as Associate Editor for NPJ Digital Medicine and BMJ Open Ophthalmology, and as reviewer for The BMJ and Lancet Digital Health. He is a member of ARVO and was listed among Elsevier–Stanford’s Top 2% Global Scientists in 2024.  

More Articles by Kai Jin

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: