The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Campaigns & Insights
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2026 / October / LASIK or Lenses?
Refractive News Latest

LASIK or Lenses?

New meta-analysis finds patient satisfaction strongly favors LASIK, despite mixed quality-of-life evidence

10/7/2026 2 min read

Share

  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Report
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll
  • Topic Commentary
5 Key Takeaways
  • 1

    The review included 4 studies with 2,141 participants: 1,275 LASIK recipients and 866 contact lens users.

  • 2

    Quality-of-life results favored LASIK under a common-effect model, but the random-effects estimate was smaller and nonsignificant amid substantial heterogeneity.

  • 3

    Patient satisfaction was reported by 88% of LASIK patients and 54% of contact lens users; 97% of participants who switched to LASIK preferred it.

  • 4

    In one large study, adverse events occurred in 9.5% of LASIK patients and 19.9% of contact lens users, while dry eye was reported in both groups.

  • 5

    The authors rated the evidence low to moderate and called for larger prospective studies with standardized quality-of-life measures and longer follow-up.

This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

Related Content

Newsletters

Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

Newsletter Signup Image

False

Advertisement

False

Advertisement

Explore More in Ophthalmology

Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist
Subscribe

About

  • About Us
  • Work at Conexiant Europe
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy
  • Your Privacy Choices
  • Advertise With Us
  • Contact Us

Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

Affiliations:

Specialties:

Areas of Expertise:

Contributions:

Disclaimer

The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: