The Ophthalmologist
  • Explore

    Explore

    • Latest
    • Insights
    • Case Studies
    • Opinion & Personal Narratives
    • Research & Innovations
    • Product Profiles

    Featured Topics

    • Anterior Segment
    • Glaucoma
    • Retina

    Issues

    • Latest Issue
    • Archive
  • Subspecialties
    • Cataract
    • Cornea
    • Glaucoma
    • Neuro-ophthalmology
    • Oculoplastics
    • Optometry
    • Pediatric
    • Retina
  • Business

    Business & Profession

    • Professional Development
    • Business and Entrepreneurship
    • Practice Management
    • Health Economics & Policy
  • Training & Education

    Career Development

    • Professional Development
    • Career Pathways

    Events

    • Webinars
    • Live Events
  • Events
    • Live Events
    • Webinars
  • Community

    People & Profiles

    • Power List
    • Voices in the Community
    • Authors & Contributors
  • Multimedia
    • Video
    • Campaigns & Insights
Subscribe
Subscribe

False

Advertisement
The Ophthalmologist / Issues / 2026 / November / Choosing the Right Refractive Procedure
Anterior Segment Refractive Insights

Choosing the Right Refractive Procedure

How preoperative screening guides the choice between PRK, SMILE, ICL and RLE

By Azhar I. Salahuddin 11/5/2026 2 min read

Share

  • Full Article
  • Summary
  • Takeaways
  • Listen
  • Scorecard
  • Quiz
  • Poll

Clinical Scorecard: Choosing the Right Refractive Procedure

At a Glance

CategoryDetail
ConditionRefractive errors and age-related focusing difficulties considered for surgical correction
Key MechanismsPRK and SMILE reshape the cornea; ICL places a corrective lens inside the eye while retaining the natural lens; RLE replaces the natural lens with an artificial one.
Target PopulationAdults considering refractive surgery, with suitability depending on prescription stability, age, corneal and ocular health, anatomy, and visual needs.
Care SettingPreoperative assessment and surgical planning by an ophthalmologist, with postoperative review and continued monitoring where required.

Key Highlights

  • Preoperative evaluation may include biometry, corneal topography or tomography, OCT, and tear film assessment.
  • PRK may be considered for selected patients with relatively thin but suitable corneas or for whom a corneal flap is a concern; recovery is generally slower than with LASIK.
  • SMILE is for eligible patients with nearsightedness, with or without astigmatism, within its approved correction range.
  • RLE replaces the natural lens; ICL corrects vision without removing corneal tissue or the natural lens.
  • No single procedure suits every patient; selection should account for anatomy, age, prescription, daily needs, risks, and expectations.

Guideline-Based Recommendations

Diagnosis

  • Assess eye health and visual requirements before recommending refractive surgery.
  • Use biometry to measure eye dimensions, including corneal curvature and anterior chamber depth; it is important for intraocular lens power calculations.
  • Use corneal topography or tomography to assess corneal shape and thickness and identify signs of keratoconus or ectasia risk.
  • Consider OCT to image structures including the retina and optic nerve, and assess tear quality, stability, and ocular surface health.

Management

  • Match the procedure to the patient's prescription, age, corneal suitability, ocular health, anatomy, and visual needs.
  • Review prescription stability and procedure-specific eligibility; SMILE does not correct every type of refractive error.
  • Consider alternatives such as ICL or, in selected cases, RLE when corneal anatomy makes laser correction unsuitable.
  • Discuss benefits, limitations, recovery, risks, and the possibility that glasses may still be needed for some activities.

Monitoring & Follow-up

  • Assess and appropriately manage dry eye issues before surgery.
  • Plan postoperative reviews; ICL requires continued monitoring after surgery.
  • For PRK, account for the time needed for the corneal surface to heal and its generally slower recovery than LASIK.

Risks

  • Removing too much corneal tissue during laser correction can increase the risk of corneal ectasia.
  • Preoperative screening may identify concerns associated with persistent dryness, glare, halos, or poor visual recovery.
  • RLE permanently removes the natural lens; its benefits and risks require careful consideration, particularly for younger patients.
  • Hormonal changes during pregnancy or breastfeeding can temporarily affect vision; the article states SMILE is not suitable during these periods.

Patient & Prescribing Data

Potential candidates include adults with stable prescriptions and suitable eye anatomy. The article describes PRK for selected patients with relatively thin but suitable corneas; SMILE for eligible nearsightedness with or without astigmatism; RLE often for adults over 40 with near-focusing difficulty or other stated indications; and ICL often for adults aged 21–45 with stable moderate to high myopia and adequate anterior eye space.

Procedure choice depends on individual measurements and needs. PRK reshapes the cornea after removing its surface layer; SMILE removes a laser-formed lenticule through a small opening; RLE replaces the natural lens; ICL places a lens inside the eye while retaining the natural lens. Eligibility and approved correction ranges require clinical review.

Clinical Best Practices

  • Review corneal measurements and ocular surface health before selecting a procedure.
  • Consider how age-related changes and daily activities, including reading, night driving, screen work, and sports, affect treatment choice.
  • Identify and address preoperative concerns or consider another procedure when appropriate.
  • Discuss recovery expectations and the possibility of continued glasses use.
  • Consider diagnostic equipment, the surgeon's experience with the technique, and planned postoperative reviews.

Related Resources & Content

    This content is an AI-generated, fully rewritten summary based on a published scholarly article. It does not reproduce the original text and is not a substitute for the original publication. Readers are encouraged to consult the source for full context, data, and methodology.

    Related Content

    Newsletters

    Receive the latest Ophthalmology news, personalities, education, and career development – weekly to your inbox.

    Newsletter Signup Image

    False

    Advertisement

    False

    Advertisement

    Explore More in Ophthalmology

    Dive deeper into the world of Ophthalmology. Explore the latest articles, case studies, expert insights, and groundbreaking research.

    False

    Advertisement
    The Ophthalmologist
    Subscribe

    About

    • About Us
    • Work at Conexiant Europe
    • Terms and Conditions
    • Privacy Policy
    • Your Privacy Choices
    • Advertise With Us
    • Contact Us

    Copyright © 2025 Texere Publishing Limited (trading as Conexiant), with registered number 08113419 whose registered office is at Booths No. 1, Booths Park, Chelford Road, Knutsford, England, WA16 8GS.

    Affiliations:

    Specialties:

    Areas of Expertise:

    Contributions:

    Disclaimer

    The Ophthalmologist website is intended solely for the eyes of healthcare professionals. Please confirm below: